Search for: "DOES 2-25" Results 7881 - 7900 of 16,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2017, 5:39 pm by LindaMBeale
  For a thorough analysis of the AMT, see A Taxing Matter series of 6 posts, beginning here. reduction of the statutory corporate tax rate for the largest corporations from 35% to 20%, which benefits primarily the highly compensated managers (who receive substantial amounts of stock options as part of their compensation) and big shareholders (who tend to be mainly the ultra wealthy who own most of the financial assets) and does little or nothing to help small businesses, that already… [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
So, Monday, October 7, November 4 and December 2. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am by Elie Maalouf
”23 In Wastewater, the plaintiff declined to answer questions about his understanding of the status of actions taken by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment during his deposition.24 He argued that doing so would reveal privileged attorney-client communications because he learned the information from his lawyer.25 The defendant subsequently moved to compel the answers to these questions. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
Hearing at Milwaukee, Aug. 25-26, 2003. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 4:58 am by Dan Harris
Professor Clarke does add though that he thinks “it’s fair to say that such cases are pretty thin on the ground. [read post]
Against this backdrop, this short note explains why the PTS decision is a discriminatory measure that operates as a quantitative restriction on the trade of telecom equipment and cannot be justified on the grounds of national security concerns, neither under EU nor under WTO law. 2. [read post]
’s (“PJM”) capacity market which receive so-called “State Subsidies”.[2]  FERC  reaffirmed that a resource within broadly-defined categories (e.g., renewable resources) receiving State Subsidies must offer capacity in PJM’s forward capacity market at or above an administratively-established price floor (i.e., the minimum offer price rule, or “MOPR”), regardless of such a resource’s actual incremental costs. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am by Soroush Seifi
A contract cannot take away this overtime pay entitlement.[6] Falconbridge does, however, reference the collective agreement when determining what a “work week” actually is, since ESA does not clearly command this aspect of the contract. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:39 am by Irina Tarsis, Esq.
What efforts are (and are not) being made to shed light on the gaps in a work’s provenance and what implications does this have for the success of restitution efforts? [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
With respect to EU law, there are three potential areas for challenge: (1) Article 401 of the VAT Directive; (2) The freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services provisions; and (3) The state aid rules laid down in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:49 am by admin
AB 51 does not invalidate arbitration agreements that are voluntary or otherwise enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Merchan (Aug. 11, 2023) State of New York response in opposition to Trump motion for recusal (June 14, 2023) Trump notice of motion for recusal (and memorandum of law in support; affirmation of Susan Necheles, Trump counsel, and two exhibits) (May 31, 2023) Trial orders Protective order (social media protective order) (May 8, 2023) Other State of New York opposition to Trump motions for reconsideration and ancillary relief request for (1) an in-person status conference to discuss adjourning the… [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Hoskins that a foreign national who does not otherwise fall within the specific categories of defendants enumerated in the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) cannot be held liable for violating the FCPA under accomplice liability theories.[1]  Stating that the FCPA does not “purport[] to rule the world,” the Second Circuit held that the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) cannot skirt the FCPA’s “carefully-drawn limitations”… [read post]