Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 7881 - 7900 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Brazil INPI sets higher grounds and prepares itself for Madrid Protocol and the 2014 World Cup (IP tango) Canada Justice Marshall Rothstein on business method patents (IP Osgoode) Oshawa school trustee seeks elimination of copyright fees (Michael Geist) Justice Vancise on the courts and copyright policy in Canada (Excess Copyright) Government responds to IP enforcement criticism, proposes changes to proceeds of crime rules (Michael Geist) Bachman Turner Overdrive trade mark dispute… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int’l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant’s defences and counterclaims granted in p [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance)   Brazil INPI sets higher grounds and prepares itself for Madrid Protocol and the 2014 World Cup (IP tango)   Canada Justice Marshall Rothstein on business method patents (IP Osgoode) Oshawa school trustee seeks elimination of copyright fees (Michael Geist) Justice Vancise on the courts and copyright policy in Canada (Excess Copyright) Government responds to IP enforcement criticism, proposes changes to proceeds of crime rules (Michael Geist) Bachman Turner Overdrive… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm
  The ICTY Statute does not give the Trial Chamber that power. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:11 am
We have a statute that says that a person who has been sentenced to die is entitled, on request, to appointment of counsel to represent him in preparing and filing post-conviction pleadings.The court shall appoint as counsel under division (I)(1) of this section only an attorney who is certified under Rule 20 of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio to represent indigent defendants charged with or convicted of an offense for which the death penalty can be or… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:07 am
NJSA 2C: 43-8 (1) In the case of a crime of the first degree, for a specific term of years which shall be fixed by the court and shall be between 10 years and 20 years; ... [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
This is the description of the second panel, featuring (among others) Judge Jeremy Fogel: Blogging, Tweeting: New Media in the Courtroom: Who qualifies as a journalist and does it really matter anymore? [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:41 pm
 In holding that these are proper discovery questions Madam Justice Arnold Bailey applied and summarize the law as follows: [39] With respect to question (a) and the demand for cellular phone records, Rule 27(20) states that "a person to be examined for discovery… shall produce for inspection on the examination all documents in his or her possession or control not privileged, relating to the matters in question in the action". [40] Liability is at issue and… [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
A sports spectator assumes similar risks as does a sports participant. [35] Courts usually conclude that a “spectator has a duty to protect himself or herself not only against the dangers of which he or she has actual knowledge but also against such dangers incident to the game as would be apparent to a reasonable person in the exercise of due care. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 2:47 am
Judge Pechman also denied the motion to dismiss the Section 20 control person liability claims against the individual officer defendants and the outside director defendants. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Under the majority’s theory, does the application of settled principles “advance” a profession or maintain the status quo? [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Under the majority’s theory, does the application of settled principles “advance” a profession or maintain the status quo? [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 10:46 pm by Simon Gibbs
  Does this also apply to CPD 32.5(1)(b) in its current form? [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 3:14 pm
Unfortunately, the book does not attempt to explain the gacaca system from the Rwandan perspective. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:44 pm
Nelson (1988), 20 B.C.L.R. (2d) 1, [1988] 2 W.W.R. 79 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 27 B.C.L.R. (2d) xxxv [Horie], Southin  J.A. concluded, at 388: [T]he maxim "ignorance of the law is no excuse" is not a rule of law determinative of an issue of statutory interpretation in every instance. [read post]