Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 7881 - 7900 of 8,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2011, 12:56 pm by Rich Vetstein
Lastly, the most important aspect of Judge Young’s ruling was his agreement that foreclosing lenders must hold both the loan (promissory note) and the mortgage together in unity, to foreclose, following the controversial Superior Court opinion in Eaton v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm by Aaron Pelley
The Court held that the superior court does not have discretion in sentencing when a firearm restriction is statutorily mandated and the legislature included no discretion to waive or limit the firearm restriction, and ordered the provision stricken from the judgment and sentence. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
Nor does New York’s statute include a judicial expulsion remedy. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
Nor does New York’s statute include a judicial expulsion remedy. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 830 cited in those decisions, this is the first published California case holding that CEQA’s 10-day service provision operates as a statute of limitations, which competes with and trumps the 90-day service statute of limitations of Government Code § 65009(c)(1). [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Phil Dixon
The decision to terminate a person from SBM continues to rest with a superior court judge and not an administrative agency (the Post-Release Supervision and Parole Commission). [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 5:03 am by Florian Mueller
The reason I think so is that no one could stand up inside those organizations and put forward a superior plan. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:52 pm by Lovechilde
”  But claims of executive privilege can be overcome by a compelling government interest in disclosure and, as the Supreme Court held in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 6:24 pm by Marc DeGirolami
Yoder (which does not represent the current test), Wooley v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:19 am by Gideon
I wrote almost a month ago about the CT Supreme Court’s extraordinary decision in State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am by Mandelman
  Mass Litigation Alliance is not the firm retained by clients, and does not represent clients in litigation. [read post]