Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 15,524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2014, 7:16 am
According to the employee, the property manager responded by saying “He’s not our employee, so figure it out. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
Harry Winston, Inc. and Harry Winston S.A. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:05 pm
But this figure must then be adjusted to 35%. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:20 am
Whether the final valuation of Marc’s shares, via negotiation or further litigation, will exceed the company’s $911,000 figure remains to be seen. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:10 am
The state of the proceedings did not therefore permit final judgment to be given, so that Mega Brands’ application to dismiss the opposition in respect of the application to register its figurative mark had to be dismissed.Says the IPKat, this is another classic example of two trivial questions -- "will Spanish people who buy toys be confused between MAGNET 4 and the MAGNEXT word and figurative marks? [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 7:35 am
.)United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Ainsi, l’article 18.2 de la charte n’impose pas à un employeur d’engager une personne dont les agissements criminels passés révèlent des traits de caractère incompatibles avec l’emploi recherché, même s’il en a obtenu le pardon. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
The TTAB cited the recent Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:15 am
The Supreme Court’s 2013 decisions in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
On Wedesday, in the course of discussing the strange procedural derailment of a Seventh Circuit appeal (Motorola v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 4:41 am
A JUDGMENT IN PARR V. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:59 am
But this is a very hot issue right now – keep particular watch on the case of Coats v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:05 am
The recent Ontario Superior Court case of Hogan v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
–State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:40 am
A close inspection of the cases supports several different theories surrounding the unusually high unanimity figures for OT13, so Court watchers will be sure to continue monitoring unanimity figures over the coming years. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
In Drescher v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
The answer to that is generally negative, thanks to the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in Crookes v Newton in 2011. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:08 am
Summary The EAT has issued a decision in the well-known and long-running retirement case of Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes, which dealt with the question: Was the retirement age of 65 PROPORTIONATE to achieve the firm’s stated aims of retention of staff and workforce planning? [read post]
