Search for: "High v State"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 35,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
Rix LJ found it significant Campbell and others v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:39 pm
" The case is Magana v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
In Correa v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:34 pm
At the time of the accident, he was driving a high-performance motorcycle on his way to a charity run.The defendant was visiting from out of state. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 1:44 pm
In Thorn v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:11 am
Supreme Court’s 2002 ruling in Ring v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
There's definitely something wrong ...The IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 relating to silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here, and this Kat here). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
" Erie County v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:46 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 9:57 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:17 am
In Whitten v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:13 am
Whitehorne v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
They made the following pertinent observations: applying Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193, under the Convention a state need only pursue a legitimate aim in a proportionate way: Strasbourg does not demand that it do any more; the court must give considerable weight to informed legislative choices, at least where the state is seeking to reconcile the competing interests of different groups in society; and a legislative or regulatory… [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:45 am
At issue in M.B.Z. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am
State Department. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm
The Fourth Circuit considered the intersection of open carry and Terry in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:21 am
The dissenting judge’s believed the appeal should not have been allowed as to not to look or to knowingly run into the path of the car displayed a very high degree of carelessness. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:39 am
The district court stated that these allegations were not 'the subject of the sentence' and are not at issue in this appeal. [read post]
