Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 10,076
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
”[1] In 2018, the Commission issued interpretive guidance to assist public companies in fulfilling their obligation to “take all required actions to inform investors about material cybersecurity risks and incidents in a timely fashion, including those companies that are subject to material cybersecurity risks but may not yet have been the target of a cyber-attack. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am
E. coliO157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4] The E. coli bacterium is… [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:33 am
Here a quick summary of my key evidence: 1. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 3:42 pm
Bush’s administration, who served while John Tower’s nomination was pending and continued briefly after the Senate voted it down. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
§ 1.501(c)(4)-1(a)(2). [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm
Its incantation through precedent is unwarranted and it does not pave a path toward a more coherent and effective health law jurisprudence. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
§1252(e)(2) and afforded additional procedural opportunities to seek asylum in the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
§875(c); and (2) Regardless of what the statute provides, does the First Amendment right of free speech require that only a person intending to cause fear with his threatening utterances be subject to criminal penalties? [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:44 pm
(For conservatives who point to John Roberts’ time on the D.C. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
It does not impede, let alone entirely foreclose, general use of the courts by would-be plaintiffs. . . . [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Does the group guidance inappropriately downplay the importance of an “agreement” in group formation? [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
John Does 1-10, No. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:05 pm
A few observations: 1. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
”[1] With the US consuming nearly 20.8 billion barrels of oil per day, and with OPEC officials claiming they will not be able to meet the projected western oil demands in 10 to 15 years, the prospect of meeting our energy needs through homegrown and renewable resources is becoming more appealing.[2],[3] But this seemingly cut and dry solution to the US dependency on fossil fuels is not as simple as it appears. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 10:01 am
[1] See, e.g., 1978 Alaska Sess. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 10:55 am
Power Blocks 1 and 2 are expected to be acquired by Entergy New Orleans and Entergy Arkansas, Inc., respectively. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm
Lanter, 2020 ONSC 205 awarding damages against 10 “John Doe” defendants in respect of defamatory internet posts. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Supposedly, the “class” members:(1) have an increased risk of identity theft, (2) incurred costs to monitor their credit activity, and (3) suffered from emotional distress.664 F.3d at 40. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Despite this, a major study conducted as the outbreak was peaking was published in the New England Journal of Medicine [1]. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]