Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 7881 - 7892
of 7,892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2006, 5:12 am
" However, the Board noted, junior's area of "prior use" includes not only areas of actual use:"The CCPA has held that: 'actual use in a territory was not necessary to establish rights in that territory, and that the inquiry should focus on the party's (1) previous business activity; (2) previous expansion or lack thereof; (3) dominance of contiguous areas; (4) presently-planned expansion; and, where applicable (5) possible market… [read post]
19 Jun 2006, 12:43 am
"To be fraudulent, the statement in question: (1) must be false; (2) must be made with knowledge that it is false; and (3) must be material to the examining attorney's decision to approve the application. [read post]
31 May 2006, 6:38 pm
Three things fall out of my background and this interest: 1) I am probably slightly more "helpful" (aka, annoying) than your average VC when it comes to discussing IP issues at board meetings; 2) I have the fun of teaching a class called "Intellectual Property and its Impact on Business" at Stanford Business School (the primary objective of which is to help future entrepreneurs know when they should call a lawyer); and 3) I can't help myself, I… [read post]
9 May 2006, 6:27 am
2. [read post]
3 Oct 2005, 2:50 am
The anonymous "John Doe" lawsuits are filed for the sole purpose of information farming and specifically to harvest personal internet protocol addresses from internet service providers. 3. [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
With that in mind, as a service to 1L's and 2, 3, and 4L's who may have forgotten, here are the six steps for making it through your classes. [read post]
14 Sep 2005, 11:51 am
RankMSN Rank SCOTUSblog #1, #5, #6 #2, #7 #7, #10 Supreme Court Blog #2, #3 #1, #4 #1, #2 SCOTUSblog ranked higher on Google, while Supreme Court Blog ranked higher on Yahoo! [read post]
14 Sep 2005, 11:51 am
RankMSN Rank SCOTUSblog #1, #5, #6 #2, #7 #7, #10 Supreme Court Blog #2, #3 #1, #4 #1, #2 SCOTUSblog ranked higher on Google, while Supreme Court Blog ranked higher on Yahoo! [read post]
26 Jul 2005, 1:00 am
"The Examining Attorney refused registration on, inter alia, the following three grounds: (1) that the subject application (filed on September 26, 1995) is barred by res judicata (claim preclusion) in light of Bose's previous failed attempt to register the same mark for the same goods; (2) that even if claim preclusion does not apply, the proposed mark is de jure functional and unregistrable; and (3) even if registration were not barred under one of the… [read post]
12 Jul 2005, 1:00 am
That approach will have to change.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Jun 2005, 1:39 pm
The Object in Evidence: The Sky Disk of Nebra[18]1. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
Results 1. [read post]
