Search for: "People v Favors"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 11,775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2012, 4:19 am
Limiting the power to authorize DNA collection to judges ensures that an adequate detachment is maintained between the investigating body and the appraiser of reasonable suspicion on which DNA collection is predicated.RetentionOnce DNA has been collected pre-trial, divergence is also evident in terms both of the period and of the form of retention.Indefinite retention of DNA was once permitted in England and Wales, but was impugned in S. and Marper v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:05 am
The purpose of virtual worlds is to bring people together. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:06 pm
(Tag: International Whistleblowers) Additionally, UK whistleblower protections received a boost in a November 27, 2019, Supreme Court decision (Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti). [read post]
4 Jan 2020, 2:00 am
In the British Columbia Court of Appeal decision in Temoin v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 6:01 pm
" Most prominently, tomorrow the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:00 am
App. 2008): This appeal stems from a summary judgment entered in favor of Autozone West, Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 1:17 pm
The case is Reilly v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:47 pm
In a lead opinion authored by Justice Mary Beth Kelly, and joined by Chief Justice Young and Justice Zahra, the Michigan Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:42 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 6:17 am
About Comcast, Think Progress wrote: The Comcast v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 10:05 am
McElroy v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:12 am
In that event, I would be in favor of abolishing Michigan No-Fault and returning Michigan to a pure tort state, where at least people injured in car accidents have some decent chance of getting compensation and protection. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
This is the first case that Aereo itself has lost, also winning a favorable decision from a District Court in Boston which essentially followed the Second Circuits reasoning (see our summary of the Boston decision here). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:53 pm
In fact, I wonder what John Adams would have made of a Supreme Court decision like Scott v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:59 am
In Dean, Milwaukee dairies challenged the city of Madison's law prohibiting the sale of milk produced more than five miles from the center of the city.Indeed, it was our old friend the Interstate Commerce Clause that was relied upon in the 1941 case of Edwards v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
In Cuevas v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:03 am
In Rumbin v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:53 am
Under the classic 1955 tort case Garratt v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:52 pm
The next step in Duncan v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
(2) During arguments, Justice Carlos Moreno had an interesting exchange that had echoes of Brown v. [read post]
