Search for: "Person v. Person" Results 7881 - 7900 of 123,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
# # #DECISIONState of New York v Summers [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:45 pm by Chijioke Okorie
But the majority of MPs (from the ruling party, African National Congress (ANC) supported the Bill and the Bill was accordingly passed.This two-part post reviews the MPs’ opposition to the CAB vis-à-vis the decision of the ConCourt in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
So, this is my personal cell phone that I talk to my wife on, that I talk to my children on, my constituents. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm by Cat Johns
On his last day of employment, de Amezaga emailed various documents related to the proration software to his personal email address. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:27 am by Ellena Erskine
“[W]e can’t be in a situation where one person can just derail this,” he said. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:02 am
The United States Supreme Court ruled definitively on this issue in its 2014 decision in Navarette v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the Matter of New York Civil Liberties Union [CLU] v New York City Department of Correction [DOC], 2023 NY Slip Op 00930, the Appellate Division noted that the personal privacy exemption in Public Officers Law §87(2)*allows state agencies to protect sensitive matters "which are of little or no public interest, and which may include unsubstantiated allegations," citing Matter of New York Times Co. v City of New York Off. of the Mayor, 194 AD3d 157. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the Matter of New York Civil Liberties Union [CLU] v New York City Department of Correction [DOC], 2023 NY Slip Op 00930, the Appellate Division noted that the personal privacy exemption in Public Officers Law §87(2)*allows state agencies to protect sensitive matters "which are of little or no public interest, and which may include unsubstantiated allegations," citing Matter of New York Times Co. v City of New York Off. of the Mayor, 194 AD3d 157. [read post]