Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 122,002
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Smith v Kunkel16 is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
See Reed v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
(Just trying to keep it real, folks.)# # #Scheibe v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 9:52 pm
The immediate effects of Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:33 pm
(See Donohue v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:25 pm
See San Diego Building Trades Council Local 2620 v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:14 pm
I find these annual overviews useful exercises in seeing how a calendar year shaped South Carolina family law. 2022 seemed like a slow year but I’m surprised that there were actually fourteen published opinions—including Rudick v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:14 pm
., lawsuits alleging that a manufacturer’s environmental marketing claims are false or deceptive.6 For example, in Duchimaza v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:09 pm
In Morgan v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:05 pm
As the court in Mallet and Co. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm
Wardlow and Kansas v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 8:17 am
See Kelly v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 8:17 am
See Kelly v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 7:46 am
It follows that the earlier trade mark cannot be found to be generic, descriptive or devoid of any distinctive character, without calling into question its validity in revocation proceedings, which would give rise to an infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (see, to that effect, judgment of 24 May 2012, Formula One Licensing v OHIM, C‑196/11 P, EU:C:2012:314, paragraphs 47, 51 and 52). [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization 20th Anniversary SymposiumPaul Gowder I'd like to sketch out a preliminary outline of a different way to think about the relationship between constitutional law and democracy, one inspired by some of James Baldwin's remarks about the relationship between the struggle for racial equality and American political identity. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:04 am
For example, last summer, the California Supreme Court ruled in an employment lawsuit of Grande v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:53 am
“The defendant must affirmatively demonstrate the absence of one of the elements of legal malpractice” (EDJ Realty, Inc. v Siegel, 202 AD3d 1059, 1060). [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:49 am
See Johnson v. 27th Ave. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:24 am
If no adaptations had been needed by Mr Idolo, it is hard to see why his primary need for three bedrooms and ground floor access would not engage the Housing Act duty. [read post]
