Search for: "Self v State"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 14,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2010, 12:38 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm
" The court concluded that "it is within Congress' power to change domestic law, even if the law originally arose from a self-executing treaty," slip op. at 10 (citing Medellin v. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 7:39 am
Line 57 Self-Employment Tax. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
In 1984, United States v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am
The decision in R (on the application of Fox) v Secretary of State for Education [2015] EWHC 3404 (Admin) concerned the new subject content issued for GCSE Religious Studies. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 8:37 am
Supreme Court ruled in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 10:55 pm
Heller--is incorporated against the states via the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
3 May 2009, 9:02 pm
But that framing of the debate, in my view, concedes far too much ground to the hard right, the self-described true conservatives, for it is only very recently that much of what we now associate with conservatism became the orthodox conservative view: Economic libertarianism; international unilateral interventionism; and state enforcement of traditional morality. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:33 pm
Read-the-whole-case rating: 3.R. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 5:32 am
The case is Russell et.al. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
It explores the act’s stated purposes, as well as its philosophical underpinnings, including the topics of enfranchisement, civilizing liberal- imperialism, culturalism, extinction, and reconciliation. [read post]
Dangerous Knives and the Intent to Use Unlawfully Against Another: Further Review of NY PL 265.01(2)
14 Mar 2017, 6:16 am
In People v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am
On May 12, 2022 the British Columbia Court of Appeal issued reasons in the case of: Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
A recitation of the facts in Jesinoski v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm
Dicta in RM (AP) (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) (Scotland) (SC(Sc) [2012] 1 WLR 3386, [2012] UKSC 58 (which considered Regina v. [read post]
1 Jun 2025, 7:26 am
She now reports on the upcoming consultations in more detail as follows: As mentioned, the Chair-Rapporteur of the OEIGWG for the Legally Binding Instrument (LBI), has confirmed the following second thematic consultation.Tuesday 3 and Wednesday 4 June, Room V, Palais des Nations: second consultation (arts. 6 and 8) Thursday 5 June, Room V, Palais des Nations: third consultation (arts. 9 and 11, if time permits, art. 10). . . [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:16 pm
In light of the conflict between our holding and the First Department's holding in People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 12:17 pm
The two cases decided by the Court yesterday in Swarthout v. [read post]
