Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2013, 5:20 am
United States and what it might ultimately mean for the president’s power to raise the debt limit on his own in a future crisis. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
United States District Judge William C. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 7:28 pm
Yudes’ June, 2013 blog post, he discussed the landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:19 pm
Hardy, and United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:27 pm
In Sterling Park v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:41 am
California, 539 U.S. 607 (2003)), that fall into four general categories. . . . [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 1:15 am
Sebelius in Light of Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 2:45 pm
Undoubtedly the state DOJ was influenced by United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am
United Space Alliance ruling. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
Last December, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a first Office action tentatively rejecting all claims of the "Steve Jobs patent", U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:50 pm
At the opening of this Term, it granted review of United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:19 am
Corcino & Associates et al., CV 13-3728 GAF (JCx), United States District Court Central District (October 7, 2013). [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:00 am
Although the Court relied exclusively on other district court decisions with regard to its injury in fact ruling, the outcome here is consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Clapper v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether criminal defendants whose assets have been frozen have a right to a pretrial hearing to challenge the basis for the charges against them so that they can use the assets to hire their counsel of choice. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
As it also explains, most state courts in the United States are courts of “general” jurisdiction, which means they can hear “any case over which no other tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Court specifically held in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:21 pm
” In its brief on the merits, the United States starts by reiterating that, under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
