Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 29,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm
A Constitution Day plea for the study of state constitutions (Real Clear Politics). [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 12:27 pm
In Abdul Latif Jameel Transportation Company v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 12:03 pm
The Sixth Circuit continued that trend in Wright v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 7:44 am
Newsom (Tribal-State Compacts) U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Susan Morgan suggested that NSA’s decommissioning of the program might itself offer Congress a reason to reauthorize CDR, as “that decision shows the Executive Branch is a responsible steward of the authority Congress afforded it. [read post]
Terrible Ninth Circuit 230(c)(2) Ruling Will Make the Internet More Dangerous–Enigma v. Malwarebytes
19 Sep 2019, 11:06 am
The demise of the Zango v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Its deterrent effect is the same as if the State were to fine them for this speech. . . . [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:42 am
In Moses v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 7:32 am
As previously reported, after the Department of Justice dropped its appeal of the district court's decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am
Several of his rulings eventually reached the Supreme Court on appeal, such as the Pentagon Papers case, United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:30 am
This is essentially his argument about Brown v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:01 pm
Newsom (Tribal-State Compacts) U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
As representatives of the Office of Inspector General (OIG) have testified before Congress, health care providers and suppliers engaging in wrongful billing practices have often been found to have relied on networks of affiliations with other fraudulent providers and suppliers. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
As representatives of the Office of Inspector General (OIG) have testified before Congress, health care providers and suppliers engaging in wrongful billing practices have often been found to have relied on networks of affiliations with other fraudulent providers and suppliers. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:54 pm
Bryant AnnexCourtroom 31333 Constitution Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-stateshttps://www.woodhullfoundation.org/our-work/fosta/For more on FOSTA:https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/how-congress-censored-internet Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:17 am
Gunn v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:03 am
’” A case on the Supreme Court’s docket this term, Espinoza v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
Over the years, Civil Investigative Demands have greatly bolstered the effectiveness of the government’s ability to examine alleged violations of the False Claims Act.[3] In 2009, Congress further expanded the use of Civil Investigative Demands when it passed the “Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009”[4] (FERA). [read post]
