Search for: "State v. Downs" Results 7881 - 7900 of 40,860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Yuanyou (Sunny) Yang
Several trade associations gave feedback, and raised five major concerns: The broad scope of the rule; The inability of many contractors to meet the August 2020 compliance deadline; (3) Whether the rule will apply outside the United States; Whether the term “use” would include a reseller’s commercial sales of prohibited products, thus preclu [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:29 am by Peter Mahler
The COVID-19 pandemic kept New York’s courthouses dark the last few months, but it didn’t slow down the output of decisions by Commercial Division judges. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
A type of ‘top-down’ approach was relied on in the 2013 US case In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC and the 2014 Japanese case Samsung v Apple Japan (Apple Japan Godo Kaisha v Samsung Electronics Co). [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
On 12 June 2020 Elisabeth Laing J handed down judgment in the case of Warnes v Forge [2020] EWHC 1496 (QB) (heard 20 May 2020). [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 11:16 am by Andrew Delaney
This puppy has nothing to do with the caseState v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm by Masha Simonova
Barriers to Judicial Vindication of Constitutional Rights On Feb. 25, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm by Linda McClain
Supreme Court struck down Virginia’s Racial Integrity Act— and the laws of 15 other states that still prohibited marriage between white people and people of other “races” — as unconstitutional and “obviously an endorsement of the doctrine of White Supremacy. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 10:38 am by Renee Knake
Supreme Court struck down anti-miscegenation laws in sixteen states that still endured in 1967. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Kristian Soltes
As a result, indirect purchaser class actions in the United States often are not certified for class treatment under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) or comparable class action rules in state courts. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Precisely because they do not invite definitional precision, the exact meaning of terms of prophetic indictment can be hard to pin down. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, Stephen McNaught, Mark McMurray, Josh Risso-Gill and Gael Hardie, who all work within the planning team at CMS, comment on the decision recently handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20, which concerned “listed buildings”. [read post]