Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 7881 - 7900 of 14,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2012, 8:05 am by Derek Dissinger
The law now is that states can opt in and get the extra money, or opt out without losing the money they're already receiving from the federal government for Medicaid. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 9:09 am by ACLU
States like Maine will be a haven for abortion access if Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:31 am by Liron Libman
The U.N. secretary-general relied—as the depositary of the Rome Statute and according to existing practice (Chapter V)—on determinations made by the U.N. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 2:49 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Moreover, the supreme court has stated that “[a]bsent a contract or statute, trial courts do not have inherent authority to require a losing party to pay the prevailing party's fees. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am by Broc Romanek
Parsing the Oral Arguments: FEF and Beckstead & Watts v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court upheld an essentially identical state law in the 1965 case of Cox v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 6:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States concerns the scope of jurisdiction in federal criminal cases. [read post]