Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 15,624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
A defendant is not entitled to a jury instruction on self-defense using deadly force where the evidence is not sufficient to support a finding that the defendant reasonably apprehended death or great bodily harm State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
From Judge Ezra Friedlander's opinion, joined by Judge Paul Mathias, in R.W. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Cooper in his October 22, 2014 decision in Joseph M. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:12 am
(Reuters/Andreea Campeanu) From Bishop Macram Max Gassis v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:49 am
In this week’s case (Payne v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 8:02 am
Sotomayor seemed to find the historical argument compelling, stating that “trust law has been clear forever” that plan participants can sue fiduciaries for self-dealing. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:38 am
The case is People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:57 am
Harrell’s stated a “cognizable self-censorship injury, … arguably caused by the challenged rules’ alleged vagueness. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:12 am
Mason v Dupont Direct Fin. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
Latif v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
In a case pending at the Supreme Court, Fulton v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
The Claimant filed reply evidence, which identified several units of self-contained accommodation in a suitable area which were available on a nightly or short let basis. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 8:41 am
From last week's decision in Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 pm
He was co-counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 4:03 pm
IndiaYouTube, LLC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 10:21 am
The owners claim the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause is “self-executing” and no state action is required. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
It might be possible, as Andy Koppelman has argued, to strike down DOMA and uphold state bans on same-sex marriage if the Court applies the Romer v. [read post]
