Search for: "T A V Holdings Inc" Results 7881 - 7900 of 12,087
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[iv] If there is no direct evidence of such an agreement, plaintiffs must show there was parallel action—where the defendants all acted in unison and the behavior “would probably not result from chance, coincidence, independent responses to common stimuli, or mere interdependence unaided by an advance understanding among the parties”[v]—and “plus factors” which show collusion. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
This being so, it was a sign, and Kenwood couldn't argue that it wasn't being used as a sign for the purposes of Arts 9(1)(b) and (c). [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
First, the joint appeals of Shannon v Rampersad and another (T/A Clifton House Residential Home and Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:37 am by Eugene Volokh
If the Municipal Court judge lacked jurisdiction to vacate the restraining order — because the case was out of his hands and in the Appeals Court’s hands — then the order hasn’t actually been vacated, the case isn’t moot, and the Appeals Court would have all the more reason to decide the First Amendment question. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor… [read post]