Search for: "United States v. Heard"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 8,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 10:21 am
United States, Docket No. 07-513.I did a similar post for Constitution Day last year. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 10:08 am
The corrections director shall make all state records available for public scrutiny and the records shall be subject to audit by the Secretary of State.(10) Prison work products or services shall be available to any public agency and to any private enterprise of any state, any nation or any American Indian or Alaskan Native tribe without restriction imposed by any state or local law, ordinance or regulation as to competition with other public or private sector… [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 11:53 pm
(As amended in 2006, the Lanham Act requires that a mark be "widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:43 pm
This case involves an issue involving one of the parties to this suit.In my day as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, I heard quite a few very skilled advocates. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:30 am
” Justice Joseph Story heard Folsom v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:21 am
In July of 2007, I was the attorney for the defendant in the divorce of Sullivan v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:58 pm
We conclude that there was plain error in the sentencing, and we therefore vacate the sentence, and remand with instructions for the district court properly to calculate the United States Sentencing Guidelines range, to discuss the 18 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:00 am
Chief Justice of the United States John G. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
United States and Arizona v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 12:35 am
Section 5, the provision that requires a number of states and local governmental units to get clearance in Washington before they may carry out any changes in voting or election procedures, was first enacted as part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:41 pm
All States that are members of the United Nations were thus under an obligation to freeze the funds and other financial resources controlled directly or indirectly by such persons or bodies. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 7:20 pm
In Chattin v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 8:53 pm
(c) The notice shall describe the works to be carried out and invite observations on them and on the estimates and shall state the name and the address in the United Kingdom of the person to whom the observations may be sent and the date by which they are to be received. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:53 am
National Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:57 am
However, I am still somehow unconvinced by divorcing licences from the issue of contracts (at least in the United States). [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
