Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 7881 - 7900 of 32,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by NCC Staff
In 2012, Justice Antonin Scalia told CNN that in his time on the bench, the Bush v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:15 pm by Terry Lenamon
  You'll remember that Justice Marshall, together with fellow Justice William Brennan, concluded in Furman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
This morning the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in American Express Co. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 11:32 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” Below is a brief summary of the other cases the justices considered: Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm by Christopher Lund
  No one’s sentiments will be controlled by the opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
The Court’s judgment, in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems (“Schrems II”), holds that the Privacy Shield does not take adequate account of U.S. laws authorizing public authorities to access data transferred from the EU to the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:03 am by Ronald Collins
” (This may have been the first sign of Ruth’s future role as one of the most active and precise questioners on the United States Supreme Court Bench.) [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm by Gene Quinn
Justice Antonin Scalia is (in)famous in patent circles for calling patent law “gobbleydegook” during the KSR v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:29 am
"Just as foreigners should respect the letter of the law in this country, the United States should abide by its treaty obligations - not just at the federal level, but in state and local jurisdictions as well. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Eugene Kontorovich (Northwestern) — who has guest-blogged here several times — passes along this item about today’s United States v. [read post]