Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 7901 - 7920 of 10,162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am by Kara OBrien
INTRODUCTION  Much ado has been made about the United Kingdom’s Draft Bribery Bill[2] (hereinafter the “Bribery Bill” or the “Bill”), an ambitious piece of legislation designed to bring Britain’s anticorruption and bribery laws into conformity with international standards, most notably the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (“OECD”) Anti-Bribery Convention. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm by Rick Hills
More significant, the bill's new methodology for implementing Mount Laurel would require N.J. local governments to accommodate only an estimated 30,000-56,000 units of affordable housing. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Curtis law firm bills itself as "the only law firm[s] in the United States" to concentrate their practice on "representing clients injured by attorneys. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:06 pm by Paralegal Mentor
The court’s opinion cited cases in the United States Supreme Court in which NALA filed an amicus brief, Missouri v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:56 am by Jon
The Fourth Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"  Twice in recent years  the United States Supreme Court has affirmed the constitutionality of JLWOP for murder cases, first in the Roper v Simmons decision in 2005, then in 2010's Graham v Florida decision. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 12:40 pm by admin
  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that there are 76 million cases of foodborne disease each year in the United States, 5,000 of which result in death. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am by Danielle Citron
 Despite still believing Assange’s actions have been harmful, I have now come to the opposite conclusion—not for the benefit of Assange, but for the benefit of Americans and of the United States. [read post]