Search for: "Does 1 to 10" Results 7901 - 7920 of 42,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2015, 7:12 pm by News Desk
The age range of those sickened to date is 1 to 67 years. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:01 pm by Jon Sands
Ollison, No. 07-55305 (7-29-10) (Hart, D.J. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 1:42 pm
How does this play out in terms of averages? [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the record does not demonstrate that the court was so vexed that it could not be impartial (22 NYCRR 100.3[E][1]; see Liteky v United States, 510 US 540, 555-556 [1994]; Hass & Gottlieb v Sook Hi Lee, 55 AD3d 433, 434 [1st Dept 2008]; People v A.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 10:00 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  All American Check Cashing has already filed its principal brief and the CFPB is seeking a 40-day extension of the date by which it must file its brief (from August 1 to September 10). [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:17 pm
May, No. 07-3515 "Denial of defendant's motion to dismiss an indictment charging him with failure to register as a sex offender is affirmed where: 1) contrary to defendant's claim, the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) applies to him; 2) prosecuting defendant under SORNA is not retrospective and does not violate the ex post facto clause; 3) he lacked standing to raise a challenge regarding the non-delegation doctrine; 4) defendant's due… [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:22 am by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
There is another subsection to G.L. c. 269 §10 that does not require a mandatory jail sentence, that being G.L. c. 269 §10(h). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:44 am by Kali Borkoski
Holder (Granted )Docket: 10-545Issue(s): (1) Does the Progress Clause of the United States Constitution, Article I, § 8, cl. 8, prohibit Congress from taking works out of the public domain? [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:53 am by Ted Frank
As I point out in an interview with Fair Warning, CJD's complaint about shorthand media reports does not support its conclusion that the result is to prejudice plaintiffs and the civil justice debate. [read post]