Search for: "In Re Brand" Results 7901 - 7920 of 14,134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2013, 5:01 am by Eric Alexander
  This time around, the generic defendants offered three arguments in their motion to dismiss:  1) the non-preempted failure to update claim was not recognized under Texas law, 2) the plaintiff lacked standing and the court subject matter jurisdiction for the claims being asserted, and 3) a re-hash of the 82.007 presumption argument from before. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:20 pm by Helena Bottemiller
“We’re going to protect these brands and products and if we don’t the U.S. government will,” he said. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:57 pm by Bexis
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), successful applications of preemption against warning claims asserted in litigation involving innovator (branded) drugs have been depressingly rare. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:46 pm by Ron
” Each brand has a separate entrance and room configurations differ but the two brands share many services, which reduces costs and offers guests more amenities. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:46 pm by Ron
The post Law Factory Re-Visited and Staying Ahead of the Law Robots appeared first on Prism Legal. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:06 am by Laura Dean
“We’re in the middle of a revolution, no problem at all,” he says. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:52 am by Bill Marler
  Three pasteurized soft cheeses are now the subject of a nationwide recall: Les Frères, Petit Frère and Petit Frère with Truffles. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:24 am by Steve Baird
So, now I think we’re probably getting somewhere closer to the truth, if I was forced to hazard a guess on this one. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
TV GUIDE ONLINE HOLDINGS, 2013 Ark. 285 – Ark: Supreme Court http://t.co/LgYmI8qiFN -> French president demands U.S. cease spying on the European Union http://t.co/Qy76mWQBPu -> A rising tide of liability awards for privacy breaches in Canada http://t.co/Z2wzQ0EZYI -> Contractual Override of Trade Secret Law http://t.co/Rj5O621LgH -> Passive Website Alone Cannot Create Jurisdiction http://t.co/O29pAELrOh -> Saudis imprisoned for allegedly inciting protests via Facebook… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 9:40 pm by Bill Marler
Food and Drug Administration indicates that Les Frères, Petit Frère, and Petit Frère with Truffles cheeses made by Crave Brothers Farmstead Cheese Company is the likely source of this outbreak. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm by Bill Marler
Marler Clark is presently representing 44 victims and their families in the 2011 Jensen Farms Listeria cantaloupe outbreak and 2 women, one who lost her child in the 2012 Marte brand Frescolina ricotta salata cheese Listeria outbreak. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 3:00 pm by Dan Harris
Local businesses routinely register enterprise names that use famous US trademarks in misleading ways, often in conjunction with goods or services for which the US brand is famous. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:28 am
These clothing lines have been reported by many fashion bloggers, sported by numerous celebrities, and receiving much publicity quickly (possibly quicker thanks to the original brands they’re ripping). [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Specifically, we’re thinking of both innovator prescription drugs and §510k medical devices. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:52 am by John L. Welch
The parties are supposed to prepare direct, cross, re-direct, and re-cross questions before the questions are propounded to the witness. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 11:24 pm
” To reconcile with what drove you to drive DUI in Pasadena, you’re going to need help from outside, trusted sources. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
True, Rule 9(b) can be satisfied without direct quotations, if they’re sufficiently specific. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:30 am by John L. Welch
Princeton Vanguard, LLC, Opposition No. 91195552 and Cancellation No. 92053001 [Claims of genericness or mere descriptiveness of the term PRETZEL CRISPS for "pretzel crackers" [PRETZEL disclaimed]].July 25, 2013 - 11 AM: Orange Brand Services, Ltd. v. [read post]