Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 10,076
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2010, 11:05 pm
Id. at 469-71; see also Sobel, supra note 2, at 1606. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:14 am
I think the Board did a better job than usual in keeping clear the distinction between de facto and de jure functionality.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:01 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada has identified six non-exhaustive factors to assist a court‘s fairness inquiry: (1) the purpose of the dealing; (2) the character of the dealing; (3) the amount of the dealing; (4) alternatives to the dealing; (5) the nature of the work; and (6) the effect of the dealing on the work. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:23 am
Plaintiff Baby John Doe 1) $45,852.67 for past medical expenses 2) $1,500,000.00 for future medical expenses 3) $25,000.00 for pain and suffering 4) $75,000.00 for future lost wages TOTAL: $1,645,852.67 The verdict will be reduced by 15% to factor in the father's… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 6:22 am
[1] Henry T. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:44 am
In an enervating ruling, the Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark COLLEGIATE COMMUNITY FINANCIAL, finding it merely descriptive of "credit union services. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:55 pm
., 1:09-cv-00736-GBL-TCB (E.D. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:35 am
By John W. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
The most useful book I’ve found so far does not mention lawyers at all, but it does review an enormous amount of research. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
The decree requires that Mobil destroy 2 of its fuel storage tanks. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 3:26 pm
Del Barber-Poor Michael’s-17July2010-Part 1 from Celes Davar on Vimeo. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 2:19 pm
This is the so-called American rule.(2) The government pays for all lawyers. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
As John often notes, the courts often leave these decisions purposely vague. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 4:09 pm
Citigroup consented to the entry of a final judgment (1) permanently restraining and enjoining it from violation of Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Exchange Act Rules 12b-20 and 13a-11 and (2) ordering it pay penalty and disgorgement of $75,000,001. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:14 am
For further information, please contact John Stigi at (310) 228-3717 or Christina Costley at (805) 879-1818. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:17 am
My questions about a more expansive role stem from 1) statements from lawmakers who support a more expansive interpretation, and 2) the fact that the commission undertook the Willingham case, which involves no DPS-accredited lab. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
(The best is the enemy of the good.)2. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
§ 3729(a)(1). [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:47 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has identified six non-exhaustive factors to assist a Court‘s fairness inquiry: (1) the purpose of the dealing; (2) the character of the dealing; (3) the amount of the dealing; (4) alternatives to the dealing; (5) the nature of the work; and (6) the effect of the dealing on the work. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm
The registry does not state the conditions of my probation. [read post]
