Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 8,225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 9:04 am
Flores, an opinion authored by Justice Kennedy. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 3:34 am
Justice Kennedy writing for a plurality, has basically blessed the change, specifically stating in a 1991 decision, Gentile v State Bar of Nevada, that: An attorney’s duties do not begin inside the courtroom door. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:58 pm
Supreme Court in Hamdan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:42 am
United States],” and he urges Kavanaugh to “say so publicly during his Senate confirmation hearings. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 11:28 am
Two months later, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
Cicelski Having just returned from watching oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the highly anticipated case Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 8:29 pm
Virginia v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
Kennedy, led a 6-3 majority rejecting the challenge. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm
See NLRB v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:58 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:03 pm
This measure did more than Supreme Court rulings, like Brown v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 10:44 pm
Virginia in 1967 when only 16 states still banned it. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
Does the Court's decision in Parents Involved v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:53 am
The third branch, and least dangerous branch, was not similarly constrained or hobbled.Since Marbury v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:35 am
Kagan advised Justice Marshall to vote to deny cert. in DeShaney v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
U.S., rather than following, as the current rule does, the more expansive standard defined by Justice Kennedy in that same case. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 5:07 am
V. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
