Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 7901 - 7920
of 21,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2008, 10:00 pm
Mark your calendars for the last week in January, when the Supreme Court is likely to issue a "grant and hold" review order, deeming this a related case to Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 3:03 pm
VALENCIA, Petitioner, v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 10:26 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
The case, of course, is Miranda v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 1:30 pm
(Arnold v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 1:30 pm
(Arnold v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Revisiting precedent is particularly appropriate where, as here, a departure would not upset settled expectations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:01 pm
When we finished reading the majority opinion in Kovach v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:19 am
’” United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:29 pm
The decision sets the stage for arguments in the case United States, et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Today, the Second Chamber of the General Court handed over two interesting judgments (cases T-426/11 and T-412/11, Maharishi Foundation Ltd. v OHIM), which provide useful guidance on the evaluation of the descriptive character of a sign, as well as on the notion of relevant public, in relation to a word sign whose meaning can be easily understood by consumers residing in different member states, due to its closeness to equivalent expressions in other national languages. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:50 am
’State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:00 pm
This holding differs from the Ninth Circuit’s holding in Marks v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 11:49 am
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:22 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:03 pm
Alaska v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
