Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 7901 - 7920 of 10,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Moreover, as Judge Posner notes, in Indiana, “elderly first cousins are permitted to marry because they can’t produce children [but] homosexuals are forbidden to marry because they can’t produce children. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 7:44 am
Looking, however, more closely into the matter, we discover that German idealism here, as in most other instances, has but given a transcendental sanction to the rules of existing society. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:18 am
Roberts does note that this holding is contrary to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Luther v Countrywide earlier this year. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:04 am
And the winner is Robert Dell, head of international powerhouse Latham & Watkins. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court has recognized, rulings that tolerate but do not affirmatively discuss and affirm a court’s jurisdiction over a matter are not entitled to any precedential weight. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:17 pm by Dan E. Stigall
An understanding the obligations of the United States under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (and other treaties implicated) would not have allowed one to predict the outcome relative to the defendant in that matter. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm by Rory Little
  Dreeben is well known for his understated and calm presentations; rather than disagreeing directly with a Justice, he may say things like (as he did yesterday) “I don’t think the Court has to go nearly that far, Justice Scalia. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 12:54 am
In his motion to dismiss the federal declaratory action brought by General Star National Insurance, personal injury attorney Robert Olkowitz has asked the court to declare that a client's expression of "displeasure" does not, as a matter of law, trigger the responsibility to put a malpractice carrier on notice. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:13 am by Kate Fort
However, there was a new issue that arose in In re Robert F. and In re Ja. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:43 am by Guest Author
There’s also the matter of the Fifth Circuit holdings that Jarkesy left in place related to nondelegation and removal. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eric Claeys
So the bar and bench might be in for a big rethink of overbreadth no matter how Dobbs turns out. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:37 am by Richard A. Rogan
THE FINANCIAL BANKING REFORM BILL: TURNING BACK THE CLOCK ON PRIVATE PLACEMENT EXEMPTIONS by Robert E. [read post]