Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 12,300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm
Although this was obviously a marketing move by Microsoft, one could scarcely deny its popularity and preference level over open source software in the bulk of the student community in India –nor was this move preventing the students to use open source software themselves if they chose to.The second set of Spicy Comments arose surrounding the open source v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 7:04 am
However he recognised that the issue has a transnational dimension and has important implications for many millions of people across the EU making use of the internet. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms [2000] AC 115, 126E-G. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 2:48 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 12:09 pm
Supp. 2d 348 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); Bryant v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am
Prone to certification even after Wal-Mart v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:04 am
Mar. 12, 2013) (.pdf, denying motion to dismiss) US v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:57 am
Others figured it out long before yesterday's publication of a FRAND rate-setting decision concerning Motorola's standard-essential patents (SEPs) -- but most people still didn't. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court said in Karcher v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:30 am
People usually think it's a good thing to be "on a roll." [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 2:28 pm
The case is Moncrieffe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:21 am
My guess is that many, if not most, people believe at least some of these statements. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 5:34 am
The appellants in the recently decided case, Vento v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 6:52 am
They want us to round people up and put them in stadiums. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm
A: Tips are intended to compensate people for giving good service not for padding the profits of employers. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:58 am
People know he’s not afraid of anything! [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
Some parts of the Bill are organized similar to the Canada Labour Code, from employment standards to health and safety, to unionized workplaces, as follows: PART I: Preliminary Matters PART II: Employment Standards PART III: Occupational Health and Safety PART IV: Appeals and Hearings re: Parts II and III PART V: Radiation Health and Safety PART VI: Labour Relations PART VII: Public Service Essential Services (Place Holder) PART VIII: Labour-Management Actions (Temporary Measures During… [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:50 am
Most people would agree that reading lengthy judgments, or overly-complicated scholarly papers, can be as helpful as counting sheep to drift off. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:30 am
Wells noted the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
