Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 8,420
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
Barker, Warner v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 10:07 pm
For starters, I highly recommend Clinton campaign Internet Director Peter Daou's Pundits v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:29 am
The case is titled Bella Bella, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:30 pm
[v] Elkin Abramowitz and Peter Scher, The Hyde Amendment: Congress Creates a Toehold for Wrongful Prosecution, 22 Champion 22 (1998). [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 4:15 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:44 am
Peter J. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Google fails to obtain pan-EU trade mark protection for ‘Gmail’ due to confusingly similar German trade mark: (Class 46), (Ars Technica),UK High Court overturns UKIPO decision to refuse computer program patent application in Symbian’s Patent Application, UKIPO announces it will appeal (equivalent patent granted by EPO):… [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:35 pm
Army Sergeant Peter J. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:48 pm
"Citing Jones v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:43 pm
Peter H. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 8:15 am
Tasara Masaya v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
The Torture of Sami Al Arian Date Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 [www.masnet.org] PITTSBURG (JURIST) March 11, 2008 - Guest Columnist Peter Erlinder of William Mitchell College of Law, attorney on appeal for Dr. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
The certainly-Irish-Canadian Peter Ryan has all the details. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:28 pm
Essentially the talk was a case study on the Full Court of the Federal Court decision In Goldman Sachs JBWere Services Pty Limited v Nikolich [2007] FCAFC 120 which upheld the original decision that Goldman Sachs J B Were Services Pty Ltd pay $515,869 in damages to a former employee, Peter Nikolich, for breach of contract as a result of Goldman Sachs not complying with certain of its policies. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:37 pm
Apparent findings to the opposite in Basildon v Whelan and in Kensington & Chelsea RLBC v Hislop [2004] HLR 434 were not part of the ratio of the decisions in those cases. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
See Pennsylvania Avenue Funds v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
UK Ltd clarifies law on keywords and sponsored search results: (IPKat), (Class 46), (Out-Law), Discussion of the End Software Patents initiative: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IAM), (IAM), (Patent Prospector), (IAM), (Securing Innovation), Global Global - General IP valuation – a Pandora’s box? [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 9:53 pm
District Court for the District of New Jersey (Judge Peter G. [read post]
