Search for: "Robert v. State"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 19,136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am
The first was Collins v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:13 am
Claims for damages against the state are barred by the 11th Amendment. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm
In Freeman v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
This morning in Kaley v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:06 pm
" United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:18 pm
Reversed.In Robert Tiller v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
Fotouhi was secretary of the Corporation, which registered with the California State Bar in January 2009. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 4:36 pm
Texas 167 days 6-3 3; Roberts(m), Stevens(c), Breyer(d) Washington State Grange v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:45 am
It's one thing to take a different view in this case and depart from what the Court did a few years ago in Stenberg v Carhart (the state PBA ban case). [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
The cost of the long, hard discovery slog that usually precedes class certification is reason enough for defendants in putative class actions -- particularly those in the Sixth Circuit states of Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee -- to take a close look at whether there is a better way. - Robert J. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:07 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:00 pm
" The case is Conaway v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 11:16 am
In reacting to the Apple II, Ken Olson, founder of Digital Equipment Corp. stated, "There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
So do you agree that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide based on Baker v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
