Search for: "STATE v. YOUNGS"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 8,900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2009, 8:40 am
Safford Unified School District #1 v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
Weaver (involving a GPS device) from the facts of the most factually similar federal precedent, United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:47 pm
Applying this rule to the facts at hand, the Court ensured equal access to bad beer regardless of sex by striking down an Oklahoma law that permitted young women between the ages of 18-21 -- but not their young male counterparts -- to buy 3.2% beer. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
The Massachusetts statute authorizing the use of state forensic examiners specifically states that all reports produced by these individuals are sworn statements to be created “for the enforcement of law. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:17 am
8Circuit.png In trial for the production, distribution and possession of child pornography, affirming exclusion of defense expert testimony that the defendant "was not a pedophile and was not sexually attracted to young girls" to explain his "motive for taking the photographs" as irrelevant to the issue of the "sexual character" of the images, in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:01 am
They overlook Young v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 11:11 am
" http://www.kentucky.com/news/state/v-print/story/832118.html Bahe Cook Cantley and Jones personal injury lawyer Larry Jones said that the news is devastating, especially since so many pool deaths are preventable. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:02 pm
Today the Eleventh Circuit handed down an interesting ruling on the reasonableness of a sentence in US v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Wheeldin v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 3:16 pm
Holder, No. 137486, in a unanimous decision authored by Justice Young. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 10:31 am
Justices Corrigan, Markman, and Young dissented, stating that the "new majority" was again ignoring (rather than overruling) settled precedent, such as Rowland v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
Justice Corrigan wrote a separate dissent, in which Justice Young joined. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:50 pm
Justices Corrigan and Young also noted that Caperton v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:42 am
State ex rel Kutil & Hess v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:59 am
The court contrasted its holding in Young v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 1:26 am
United States, Chief Justice William H. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:03 am
"Earlier coverage of the case is here; more at the ScotusWiki page for Wood v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:50 am
Id. at *31.Although the South Carolina Supreme Court did not directly address the "essentially the same condition" requirement in Young v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 7:18 pm
Justices Corrigan, Markman, and Young dissented, stating that the "new majority" was ignoring (rather than overruling) settled precedent, such as Thornton v. [read post]
