Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 10,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 3:42 pm
The United States Supreme Court today affirmed an injunction by a three-judge panel requiring California to release prisoners so that within two years the state’s prisons are at no more than 137.5% of their designed occupancy limits. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:36 pm
United States, 347 U.S. 645, 652-53, 74 S.Ct. 826, 98 L.Ed. 1015 (1954)).... [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:07 am
More specifically, if the plan is governed by ERISA, the United States Code at 29 U.S.C. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:00 am
But it doesn't matter because it doesn't look like there have been more than two cases of SJS-from-cephalexin in the United States from 1992 to 2008. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 12:34 pm
Nearly 50% of DaimlerChrysler’s global sales are in the United States, and 2.4% of its total sales are in California. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:07 am
Corp. (13 NY3d 511 [2009]) and Matter of Kaur v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:34 pm
United States. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles at issue in a case called United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Upon entry into force of this Treaty, the Extradition Treaty between the United States and Great Britain signed at London, December 22, 1931, will cease to have effect, with certain exceptions, between the United States and Malaysia. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:22 am
I broke the class into eleven "courts" of 5-6, assigned to review the Eleventh Circuit's decision in Speaker v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:37 pm
WO 01/08661 to Maloney ("Maloney"), both alone and in combination with United States Patent No. 5,047,248 to Calanchi et al. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:10 pm
In short, BAR/BRI seems like a money-making machine. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:35 am
However, the United States is not a party to that treaty. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am
LEARN IT, LIVE IT, LOVE IT SECURITIZATION The History of Financial Regulation in the United States What is Securitization? [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:18 am
Indeed, when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:03 pm
Heddon, 149 U.S. 304 (1893), in which the Supreme Court of the United States had to decide whether at tomato is a fruit or a vegetable for purposes of the Tariff Act of March 3, 1883. [read post]
