Search for: "State v. A. T. D." Results 7901 - 7920 of 23,982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2011, 2:15 pm by CJLF Staff
Many county officials are worried they don't have the financial resources to handle the tens of thousands of inmates that will be shifted from state to local custody beginning October 1. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:56 am by Florian Mueller
"That report came a week after I had stated essentially the same thing on this blog.If I were in Qualcomm's shoes, I'd really hope Judge Curiel isn't aware of Qualcomm's investor relations announcements, such as (especially) today's news of the acceleration of its huge share repurchase program. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Wasserman ("[T]his paper draws on novel patent-processing data and presents evidence suggesting that the PTO will attempt to maintain as much aggregate application throughput as it can during times of financial strain by prioritizing the examination of applications within those technologies that cost the PTO the least to review.")Enabling Patentless Innovation, by Clark D. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 2:35 am
In these cases, the Court stated, the claimant have to ground their standing to sue for all and any content over which they claim infringement. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:52 am by Albert S. Chu
Moreover, JustMed didn’t provide benefits or report Byce’s employment to the state. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Collins v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
That's because a lot of states don't recognize claims for post-sale duty to warn. [read post]
26 Apr 2006, 10:25 pm by Jeff
Right to Know About the Child Jenny states quite correctly that if the mother doesn’t let the father know about the pregnancy, then the father doesn’t really have any parenting rights. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:25 am
  The United States argues that the defendant was the true addressee; hence, why isn't that binding on the government, as an admission that the defendant does have standing? [read post]