Search for: "State v. Country" Results 7901 - 7920 of 26,700
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2019, 1:34 pm by John Floyd
  On April 8, 2019, the Fifth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 5:30 am by Andrei Gribakov
Chapter V of the GDPR prohibits the transfer of personal data between the EEA and a third country unless the transfer falls under an enumerated legal mechanism. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Nearly every state in the country has at least one college-in-prison program. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 1:29 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Buying, selling or transporting those seeds out-of-state though is where things can get dicey. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 10:37 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenesisolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm by Mark Graber
McFarland draft an internal letter stating that the President had not directed Flynn to discuss sanctions with Kislyak. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am by Jackie McDermott
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
City of El Paso  (Tribal Real Property) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.html Mitchell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
According to Steil and Traficonte, the Court’s Bank of America v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:02 pm by Trey Apffel
In March 2019, three Texas lawyers sued the State Bar of Texas claiming that under Janus v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:02 pm by Trey Apffel
In March 2019, three Texas lawyers sued the State Bar of Texas claiming that under Janus v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am by ASAD KHAN
Lord Lloyd-Jones concurred with Lord Neuberger’s observation in ZA (Nigeria) that rule 353 has an independent effect which is that no right of appeal ever arises, rather than only to limit to an out-of-country appeal, and the rule operates at a prior stage to s 94. [read post]