Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 8,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
” One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:39 pm
In Fedsure Life Assurance Ltd v Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council, the principle of legality was held to mean that a body exercising public power is required to act within the powers lawfully given to it, and in President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union, the principle necessitated that the holder of the public power must act in good faith and not misconstrue his powers. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 4:18 pm
See Law v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:21 pm
§ 512.[4] Viacom Int’l Inc., v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 2:56 pm
State of NCT of Delhi, reaffirmed its views set out in the case of Sunil Bharti Mittal v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:45 am
In Kerala Financial Corpn. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
In Kerala Financial Corpn. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 3:07 am
“The mere failure to hold shareholders’ meetings in and of itself, does not constitute sufficient grounds to bring about dissolution under [BCL § 1104 (c)]” (Nelkin v H.J.R. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 8:25 am
” Perkins v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:00 am
Canada US targets Canada over copyright in Special 301 Report (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) (Michael Geist) Federal Court awards $250,000 to Microsoft over sale of two computers with unauthorised copies of Microsoft software: Microsoft v PC Village et al (Excess Copyright) CIRA: Complaint dismissed, costs awarded against… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:17 pm
In fact, we are aware of only a single case – Winston Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am
Once granted, the patent has immense value, and is protected against all but the strongest invalidity challenges thanks to the Supreme Court’s opinion in Microsoft v. i4i last summer. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:56 am
While put rights generally are a strong exit mechanism, GMX Technologies v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:41 am
Weidner (pictured left), Dean Emeritus and Alumni Centennial Professor at Florida State University College of Law, and Daniel S. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 4:05 am
Is Decker a Member, an Economic Interest Holder, or Something Else? [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:42 am
A terrible joke for a serious issue that has plagued the US farming community and US courts for years – most recently in an appeal from the Southern District of Indiana to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") in the case of Monsanto v Bowman. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
L’Anza Int’l and Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:54 pm
Fehribach v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
His interpretation of the Annex contradicts the most basic cannon of treaty interpretation under the Vienna Convention on the law of treaties, which states in Article 31 that “A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose. [read post]
