Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 155,369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2007, 12:57 pm
EPA decision, the Vermont greenhouse gas emissions trial, state efforts to limit emissions, and links to news and commentary on warming law. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 2:24 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:01 am
Not only does this case state trademark law essentials clearly - “[T]rademark law is grounded on a likelihood of confusion standard. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
United States or Printz v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:22 am
The Court's holding in Apprendi led to its holding that the United States Sentencing Guidelines were advisory, rather than mandatory, five years later, in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:04 pm
State Department’s mandatory retirement at age 65 of certain employees policy violates Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) Miller v Clinton, United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Docket #10-5405 The United States Department of State terminated the employment of John R. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:46 am
State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 9:01 am
–State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:51 am
In our Advertising & Marketing Law casebook, Prof. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 10:29 am
Supreme Court on July 26 issued its judgment in the case of Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 6:49 am
Here are the materials in Fredericks v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:48 pm
State of Oklahoma and Muscogee (Creek) Nation (Nonmember Taxation)State of South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:28 pm
The recent United States Supreme Court ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 10:09 am
Spousal maintenance in New York can be terminated under specific conditions defined by state law. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 8:48 am
However, under Florida law, a choice of law provision does not automatically confer personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state litigant to be sued in the same state as the chosen law. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 1:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Reading para 22 of Sch 2 together with para 16 his Lordship held that: … Applying the strict approach to interpretation which I consider is required here, these provisions must be taken to refer to detention which is lawful … The words employed are certainly not appropriate to refer to a state of purported detention or to embrace both lawful and unlawful detention. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:37 pm
A list: Negotiating Jurisdiction: Retroceding State Authority over Indian Country Granted by Public Law 280 Robert T. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:37 am
Smith v. [read post]
