Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 7901 - 7920
of 29,478
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2010, 1:22 am
The then Lord Justice Neuberger was one the Court of Appeal judges in the seminal 2005 privacy decision in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:17 am
This is not exactly an obvious libertarian position: If one level of government is bad, then one might think that two levels of government are twice as bad. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:19 pm
Examples include State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 5:36 am
In Kimble v. [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 3:31 pm
” He noted that despite the Supreme Court’s decision to return abortion policy to the states, Ohio’s attorney general has attempted to restrict abortion rights rather than uphold this state-level constitutional protection. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:14 pm
" * State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:59 pm
In its decision, the Appeals Court stated, “The defendant claims that he needs the juror information in order to contact the seated jurors pursuant to the procedures set forth in Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:09 am
According to Maine (and supporting amici), the federal government’s threat to withhold all Medicaid funding should Maine restrict Medicaid eligibility below pre-existing levels is unconstitutionally coercive and violates the Medicaid holding of NFIB v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
But ONGC v SAW Pipes gives some indication on such types of cases, viz. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm
Holder and Shelby County v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
With more than two-thirds of the states gaining more power under a one-state-one-vote system, it is difficult to believe that the convention will agree to award states votes based on population. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:35 am
The Supreme Court has handed down its decision in Sienkiewicz v Greif. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:58 pm
It is too early to tell whether it will affect class certification decisions in the state. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:57 am
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Sumption stated that the Court of Appeal’s finding that the Authority’s evaluation was irrational was unjustified. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:00 am
During Tuesday’s telephonic oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:18 am
People v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
While SORA allows any sex offender to petition for modification, no relief is available to a risk level one sex offender, who is already classified in the lowest designation and has no statutory right to petition for complete relief from registration as in Matter of Attorney Gen. of the State of N.Y. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:30 am
AM v. [read post]
