Search for: "State v. Money" Results 7901 - 7920 of 20,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 am by Adam Chandler
Phelps, a case about anti-gay funeral protesting; and Bruesewitz v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:17 am by John Hopkins
In a case called McCall v the United States the Florida Supreme Court has already ruled the non-economic damage caps are unconstitutional for the wrongful death of someone caused by medical malpractice. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:12 am by Andrew Perlman
"  Here is the abstract:This Article considers the significant state court reform developments in the year following the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Caperton v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Matrix Law
In 2013, Ukraine issued Eurobonds (“the Notes”) with a nominal value of US $3 billion and carrying interest at 5% per annum to Russia, and Russia paid the subscription money to Ukraine. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 3:39 pm by Ken Chan
The Complaint accused the Defendants of fraud and negligent misrepresentation.Timothy Mellon v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:43 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Rules as to Restitution, Offsets to Victim Of 1992 Wire Fraud, Money Launder Scheme United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:10 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCRIMINAL PRACTICENo Reversible Error in Decision Not to Re-Sentence Pursuant to 'Crosby' After Remand United States, appellee v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:17 am
Bassen WESTCHESTER COUNTYContracts Buyer Granted Judgment, Awarded Return of Money Paid for Extended Warranty Sold by Seller Vey v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:00 am by Ellen Podgor
United States, finding that intangible property did not meet the definition of “money or property” in a 1909 statutory amendment; Cleveland v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:37 pm
  Here's the money quote from the Court of Appeal that states its holding on this issue:  "The conclusions of the therapists on the JCST panel that they would be compelled to reveal any disclosures made by petitioner are therefore incorrect. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:00 am by PunditMom
That was the practical upshot of the ruling in the highly-watched case Dukes v. [read post]