Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 13,225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2012, 3:15 am
In Lenartz v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 1:24 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 1:58 pm
Realtek Semiconductor Corp. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 8:18 am
In the Colorado Case of PEOPLE v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 12:16 pm
LaFrance Corp. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 11:13 am
In rejecting an FTC challenge to oligopolistic pricing — by which firms in a concentrated market may achieve price uniformity without overt or tacit coordination, that is without contravening the antitrust laws — the Second Circuit emphasized: the Commission owes a duty to define the conditions under which conduct claimed to facilitate price uniformity would be unfair so that businesses will have an inkling as to what they can lawfully do rather than be left in… [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:22 am
The article uses Besinger v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:22 am
The article uses Besinger v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:23 am
Price, Roper, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, 183 Cal. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Kolon case, TianRui Group v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 12:26 pm
The lawsuit, which was filed in New York State Supreme Court in the Bronx, claims that from the start of the 2009 baseball season until June of 2011, the menu for in seat service at Yankee Stadium stated that a 20% service charge would be added to the listed prices, and that “additional gratuity is at your discretion. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 7:04 am
Royal Capital Development LLC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 1:43 pm
A colleague of mine, whose views on this topic differ, suggested in a debate recently that United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:01 am
Assoc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 9:11 am
As demonstrated by the recent case of Cyberlock Consulting v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 5:11 am
If you do that again, we will raise our price. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The principled response in each of these situations is the same: invite the other party to state their reasoning, suggest objective criteria that may apply and finally, refuse to budge except on the basis of objective criteria. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm
Even if they are correct, the parties pressing for government antitrust action against Google cannot claim the courts have ever recognized the concept of natural monopoly as a surrogate for the United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 6:53 pm
“Through these two avenues, [Kohn] was given a full opportunity to express his personal views on the Government’s theory of the case and the state of competition in the e-books market. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 1:14 pm
The October 2, 2012, decision in U.S. v. [read post]
