Search for: "State v. So"
Results 7901 - 7920
of 117,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
It was Proclaimed by the President of the United States on August 26, 1910. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:31 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:11 am
No study, so far as we are aware, has looked at contemporary attitudes toward Bush v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm
In doing so, he turns to the 1765 English case of Entick v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
State and State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
In doing so, the United States Supreme Court stated the following: This Court has never departed from the rule announced in Ker v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 8:04 am
The court explains why no state actor is responsible for enforcing the law, so the plaintiffs lack Article III standing. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:00 am
These dust standards are revised every five years, so it is difficult to predict the final impact of the ruling. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:47 am
Berryman, 589 So.2d 225, 228-29 (Fla.1991); Roberts v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:04 pm
It's so, so nice to live in a state that has an incredibly smart state supreme court.As it happens, I was at oral argument in the California Supreme Court last week, and was incredibly -- incredibly -- impressed with the questions from the bench. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
Baker v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 1:30 am
Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:16 am
The Court of Appeals upheld her firing under Garcetti, stating that a teacher’s speech is a “commodity” that has been sold to the state. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:12 pm
The Constitutional Court in State Information Technology Agency Soc Limited v Gijima Holdings (Pty) Ltd held that a state applicant seeking the judicial review of their own decision may not rely on the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 2000 and must do so in terms of the principle of legality. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:11 am
State, __ So.3d __, 2013 WL 1091690 (Florida Court of Appeals 2013). [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
In FTC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 12:32 pm
Holt, 152 So. 3d 745, 747 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (citing Granite Rock Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:24 am
The assessment of damages is subject to the “ceiling” on damages in defamation cases – which the the Judge suggests is now £256,000 ([26]) – although he noted that it was recently stated to be £230-240,000 in Al-Amoudi v Kifle [2011] EWHC 2037 (QB). [read post]
