Search for: "State v. Thomas" Results 7901 - 7920 of 15,436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 7:44 am by Calvin Massey
  One might wonder why Justices Kennedy and Thomas joined. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:21 am
In any event, the practice in many States already accords with today's decision, and the serious disruption predicted by respondent and the dissent has not materialized.The other case is Safford United School District # 1 v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
A second part of its test, Thomas said, was to ask whether the banned guns related to the efficient operation of the state militia. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:23 am by Susan Brenner
Lopez warned Monty Harris, a Time Warner Cable crew chief and field technician, and two supervisors, Lance Giancotti and Thomas Bonelli, that [Puesan] might do something to the computers in the company's `service ready room. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:22 am by NCC Staff
Link: Read The Decision In the 5-4 decision in the Walker III V. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:07 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States Supreme Court rendered a notable opinion in January 2016. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 1:59 am by INFORRM
CrosbyDecision Date: February 19, 2019 Justice Thomas of the Supreme Court of the United States wrote an opinion concurring in the denial of certiorari in which he stated that the “actual malice” doctrine established in the New York Times v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am by Adam Feldman
Thomas and Sotomayor only once voted together without any other justices, in dissent from the 2016 decision in Voisine v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 12:41 pm by Gene Quinn
Thomas Jefferson (then Secretary of State), along with Secretary of War Henry Knox, and Attorney General Edmund Randolph, made up the first patent examination panel for the United States of America. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am by Adam Feldman
Justice Clarence Thomas employed a similar tactic with his majority opinion in last term’s Franchise Tax Board v. [read post]