Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al" Results 7901 - 7920 of 8,486
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2008, 4:39 am
I don't think John, et al., thought that their arguments would withstand scrutiny if presented to a court. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 7:25 am
., et al., No. 05-300963, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed its long standing decision that a watercraft under construction is not a “vessel in navigation” for purposes of the Jones Act. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 8:38 pm
The accounts in recent days of the Vice President and several agency heads and other high government officials (Ashcroft, Rice, Powell, Tenet, Gonzales, Rumsfeld, et al.), convening meeting after meeting at which they carefully and dispassionately reached a consensus that the United States should establish a systematized, bureaucratic regime of officially sanctioned waterboarding and other plainly proscribed war crimes have struck me as old news -- not terribly… [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:02 pm
There have been several accounts in recent days of the Vice President and several agency heads and other high government officials (Ashcroft, Rice, Powell, Tenet, Gonzales, Rumsfeld, et al.), convening meeting after meeting in which they deliberately and dispassionately formed a consensus that the United States should establish a systematized, bureaucratic regime of officially sanctioned waterboarding and other plainly proscribed war crimes.These stories have… [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:07 am
John's United Church of Christ, et al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
  The intention of section 74.1 is to attribute back to a transferor spouse income from property transferred to a lower income spouse so as to make the individual tax unit efficacious. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 7:06 am
Eurodif, S.A.; USEC, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Laurel Terry, Professor, Penn State Dickinson School of Law, The EU's Professional Services Competition Initiative: Is the EU Very Far Behind Australia and the UK With Respect to Publicly Traded Law Firms? [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:40 am
Wolters Kluwer United States, Inc. et al. (2007) 149 Cal.App. 4th 285, 290-291 (certified for partial publication). [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
The Act further mandates that the clinician's report explicitly state an assessment of the level of risk posed that the offender will commit another 'relevant' offence if released in the community and not made subject to the extended supervision order (where 'relevant' equates to any sexual offence committed against a child under age 18). [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 2:21 am
Clearly, the extent to which this prerequisite is met is problematic in the Langevin et al. study. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:25 pm
There is certainly a contradiction with some of Obama's earlier stated positions on "meeting with dictators" et al. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:00 am
REES, COMMISSIONER,KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTIONS, ET AL. [read post]