Search for: "Thomas View" Results 7901 - 7920 of 12,028
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2012, 6:49 am by Joe Palazzolo
The changes follow lawsuits against Thomas M. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 pm by Benjamin Wittes
By Benjamin Wittes & Ritika Singh The military commission for Abd al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed Abdu Al-Nashiri convenes again tomorrow for a motions hearing at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:35 pm by Lawrence Solum
"  I won't offer arguments for or against noncognitivism or relativism here--but I will note that these views do not command support from a consensus of philosophers who work on metaethics. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
  All the judges of the Court of Appeal were firmly of the view that the issue of whether or not WCI had repudiated the contract and whether or not ADI had the right to terminate the contract based on repudiation, was to be determined on an objective basis. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  Unlike some of my liberal colleagues, I do not regard Thomas as a cipher on the court; his views on federalism, for example, are probably as well-developed and cogent as anyone’s on the Court. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:31 am by Richard A. Epstein
  Once again, the near plaintive objection of Justice Thomas affirms our faith in the clarity of the English language. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:50 pm by George Lenard
embaPub="6e3197aae95c2ff8fcab35cb730f6a86"; Introduction: Supreme Court Case on Ministerial Exception to Employment Discrimination Law The Supreme Court has now held, in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:37 pm
He said the court doesn't express any views on any other types of suits by religious employees, for example, breach of contract or injuries they may have endured on the job. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:04 am by Lyle Denniston
   The New Hampshire Supreme Court had taken the opposite view, as had several federal appeals courts and other courts. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:04 am by Jon Robinson
That view cannot be squared with §1333(b)’s language. (3) Pacific’s policy concerns also cannot justify an interpretation of §1333(b) that is inconsistent with the OCSLA’s text. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:33 am by Lyle Denniston
  His separate comments suggested that, even if such a lawsuit got into court at all, it would swiftly be out of court as soon as the denomination filed an explicit claim that the employee fit the exception — in its view, not that of the court. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
In fact, Justice Scalia, joined by Justice Thomas, reiterated the call to limit Bivens to their facts, if not outright overruling them. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:22 am by Lyle Denniston
(docket 10-1293), nothing seemed predictable and, thus, Justice Clarence Thomas’s customary silence may have been the most eloquent expression. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:31 pm by Lovechilde
His views on abortion, for example, change with the winds. [read post]