Search for: "Thomas v. State" Results 7901 - 7920 of 15,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
Department of Justice filed an information, alleging that on five occasions between January 19, 2007 and July 5, 2007, [Mark Thomas Rossini] `intentionally and knowingly exceeded his authorized access to a protected computer belonging to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, an agency of the United States headquartered in the District of Columbia, and by such act obtained information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation that he was not permitted to receive,’ in… [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
  Uber’s own drivers have brought a class action in a case called Yucesoy v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 8:47 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Thomas suggested that the Board here isn’t a permanent entity like the State Board of Elections is. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:48 pm by Kirk Jenkins
During its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Marks v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm by Thomas Dominczyk
  Today the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied a petition for leave to file an interlocutory appeal in the matter of Patrick v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 4:20 am by Howard Friedman
SCOTUSblog reports on developments.Meanwhile, the state of Louisiana filed a petition for certiorari (full text) in Robicheaux v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 2:22 am by Amy Howe
Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Capitol Times) previews the oral arguments in Reed v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in King v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:16 am
  Similarly, the FDA Law Blog’s post highlights a statement in last week’s United States Supreme Court denial of certiorariin Whitman v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf dissects Justice Clarence Thomas’s statement respecting last week’s denial of a stay application in Maricopa County v. [read post]