Search for: "C. R. C."
Results 7921 - 7940
of 58,027
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2019, 10:28 am
Photo Arbre Evolution sur Flickr (licence CC BY SA) Règle n° 1 : ne faites pas travailler des ouvriers "au black". [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
” 2) Member States can no longer require a higher level of originality for works of applied art/designs, says AG Szpunar in Cofemel by Estelle Derclaye “On 2 May 2019, Advocate General Szpunar delivered his opinion in Case C-683/17, Cofemel – Sociedade de Vestuário SA v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 2:57 am
” 2) Member States can no longer require a higher level of originality for works of applied art/designs, says AG Szpunar in Cofemel by Estelle Derclaye “On 2 May 2019, Advocate General Szpunar delivered his opinion in Case C-683/17, Cofemel – Sociedade de Vestuário SA v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 8:32 pm
Notably, the amendment would: Clarify in Section 110(c) (“Access Rights” for businesses that collect personal information) that the consumer has the right to request the specific pieces of personal information the business has collected. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 1:24 pm
“[C]ustomers cannot simply look at a flange to determine whether it has been normalized,” but must rely on sellers. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 8:03 am
§ 512(c)(3)(A)(v). [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Where the compensation is not adequate, however, the arrangement would involve a gift to the superior in violation of the standards in subpart C of this part. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 3:41 am
Bellure NV (C-487/07), a smell alike case, where the CJEU asserted in its preliminary ruling that the taking unfair advantage of a mark does not require the existence of a risk of confusion. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 3:07 am
First of all, the AG addresses the issue of jurisdiction by referring to the CJEU’s eDate decision (C-509/09, C-161/10): „the court of a Member State may, as a general rule, adjudicate on the removal of content outside the territory of that Member State, as the territorial extent of its jurisdiction is universal. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 12:32 am
Por eso, esta sentencia es un gran avance en los derechos de los empleados públicos a la publicidad e igualdad, pues suple lo que el legislador básico no se atrevió a decir para evitar alterar cómodas prácticas consolidadas. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Tyson Foods is entering the meat reduction market. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:51 pm
Per California Education Code §48925(c), (c) “Schoolday” means a day upon which the schools of the district are in session or weekdays during the summer recess. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 2:31 pm
Simek, and Michael C. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 1:27 pm
Next week, Wyoming’s Revenue Committee will meet to consider an idea which gained traction during the 2019 legislative session: the National Retail Fairness Act, which would impose a 7 percent corporate income tax on C corporations with more than 100 shareholders that operate in the retail, accommodations, and food services industries. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 1:21 pm
Retrieved June 26, 2019, from https://connectingvets.radio.com/articles/feres-doctrine-senator-kennedy-joins-effort-allow-military-sue-malpractice Grisales, C. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:45 am
Under such a standard, they both agree, the USPTO could refuse registration under the Lanham Act to reject the application for “F-U-C-T. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
The judges’ conclusions on the key issues In order to make good an art 14 claim, a claimant has to establish that (a) the circumstances fall within the ambit of a substantive Convention right, (b) the claimant has a relevant status for the purposes of art 14, (c) they have been treated differently from others in a similar situation, by reason of their status; if so the burden is then on the state to demonstrate (d) whether the difference in treatment is objectively justified. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:56 am
§ 2510.302(c)). [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:51 am
However, if it wishes to do so, this means that there is a higher standard for the reasoning that must be provided by EUIPO if it wishes to depart from what national bodies ascertained to be the acceptable standards of morality within the same space, with regard to, apparently, the same general public, and at the same time.In this case, the EUIPO failed to meet such standard.The EUIPO also failed to explain why the 'Fack Ju Göhte' should have a different outcome than previous… [read post]
