Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 7921 - 7940 of 40,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2020, 4:41 am
Dozens of them are frauds4/ All that said, that many of the Letter’s signatories are frauds does not impugn the principles they’re cynically invoking for their petty, self-absorbed interests. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 6:34 am by Giles Peaker
It does, however, quite possibly mean that those possession claims will take longer. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 1:17 pm by Steve Vladeck
It does not seem like a stretch to interpret that provision to require an officer to at least identify themselves (1) as a federal law enforcement officer; if not (2) as an employee of a specific federal agency with law enforcement authority. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 12:56 pm by Sami Azhari
The law provides penalties of up to 10-20 years federal prison for certifying false reports: Whoever— (1) certifies any statement as set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of this section knowing that the periodic report accompanying the statement does not comport with all the requirements set forth in this section shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both; or (2) willfully certifies any statement as set forth in subsections (a) and… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 11:07 am by Michael Lowe
  This does not mean that there are a correspondingly vast number of factual bases for these investigations. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(NY St Cts Elec Filing System [NYSCEF] Doc No. 149, second amended verified complaint, ¶ 2). [read post]
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But because Courier is organized as a media outlet, it does not have to disclose its donors or the total money it spends promoting politicians. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 1:18 am by Tessa Shepperson
  What it does not mean is that landlords and agents have GOT to decide in favour of benefit applications. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 1:18 am by Tessa Shepperson
  What it does not mean is that landlords and agents have GOT to decide in favour of benefit applications. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 8:07 pm by Joseph S. Persoff
Serving as somewhat of a hybrid motion to dismiss/motion for summary judgment, California’s anti-SLAPP statute provides defendants a procedural device to obtain early dismissal of a plaintiff’s claim that targets conduct implicating the defendant’s constitutional rights of speech and petition. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 3:37 pm by Danny O'Brien
Five years after the original iceberg of Schrems 1, Schrems 2 has pushed the Titanic fully beneath the waves. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  On July 2, 2020, a plaintiff shareholder filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit against twelve members of the Facebook board of directors, also naming the company itself as nominal defendant. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm by Guest Blogger
  But that does not justify dismissing the Court’s progressive-friendly decisions as exclusively or even primarily political. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:30 am by John Kennerty
Does this mean cruise ship will not be liable for Coronavirus related lawsuits. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Plaintiff stated claim for a free speech violation where Sheriff allegedly interfered with legal mail; defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity; (2) Qualified immunity applied to alleged Fourth Amendment violation; other claims were waived Haze v. [read post]