Search for: "Fields v. A S" Results 7921 - 7940 of 17,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2013, 7:23 pm by Wells Bennett
As it so happens, I also had occasion this week to reflect on my field unit’s work in Afghanistan two years ago, near the tenth anniversary of the attacks. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 1:54 am
Sharp "While the expert's opinion that accelerant was used to start the fire is inadmissible because the canine alert on which he relies is unreliable in the absence of laboratory confirmation, the opinion that the fire was caused by arson, based on a process-of-elimination technique that is generally accepted in the field of fire investigation, is admissible. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
Before long, though, police located him, and gave him field sobriety tests, which he reportedly failed. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The cause of action to recover damages for professional negligence, which arose from the same facts as the legal malpractice claim and did not allege distinct damages, was likewise governed by the three-year statute of limitations (see Scott v Fields, 85 AD3d 756 [2011]; see also Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d 159, 159 [2014]). [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 7:20 pm by Patricia Salkin
This merger would allow it to utilize an exception to the Zoning Code’s off-street parking requirement for “interior restaurants that abut municipal parking fields,” as the adjoining property was adjacent to a municipal parking lot. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:20 am by Ilya Somin
Consider, for instance, the victims of three of the biggest mass murders in all of human history: Mao Zedong's terror famine, which killed a record 45 million people, Stalin's famines and Gulags, and the "killing fields" of Cambodia. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 11:09 am by South Florida Lawyers
Oh goodness it feels like it's been years since I've read a nice, logical, clearly expressed opinion by Judge Salter, and this week the good Judge is back and his singing voice as strong as ever.Let's dig in:CRC 603 v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]