Search for: "In re R. F."
Results 7921 - 7940
of 10,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 10:23 am
., 581 F.3d 1336, 1346 (Fed. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 7:27 am
Image source: f-l-e-x via Flickr ———— See more of what’s in the filings: Check out FootnotedPro, where we highlight unusual opportunities and potential problems well in advance of the market. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:24 am
., 392 F.3d 1317, 1324-25 (Fed. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
The TTAB applied the traditional "du Pont factors" analysis (citing In re E. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:49 am
Garcia, 94 F.3d 57 (2nd Cir. 1996). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 3:31 am
The OPSI and SLD websites are in the process of being decommissioned with users re-directed to this new service. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 2:49 pm
They're dumb and crazy. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 3:00 pm
United States, 299 F.2d 122, 123 (D.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:13 am
El Paso Co., 682 F.2d 530 (5th Cir. 1982); See also, Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:41 am
ert rudimentäre Rechtsangleichung im Filmurheberrecht durch Harmonisierungsrichtlinien bewirkt. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
Sandgrund and Scott F. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
The expert will execute a confidentiality agreement (to be agreed upon by the parties) governing non-disclosure of the contents of the clone and its re-delivery to defendant's counsel after completion of electronic discovery. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:10 am
Today’s (alleged) miscreant is Olufemi F. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
Then, however, the House passed an alternative bill that didn't provide for an F-MAP extension. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
This promise, like other portions of Apple's marketing material for the iPad, is false.Having allegedly bought their iPads because they were looking for something that was not a book but worked just like one, plaintiffs are now seeking damages and/or restitution on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated consumers (assuming there are any).At Consumerist, where I saw this, Chris Walters wrote that "[i]f the plaintiffs win, I think Apple should also be… [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
"[1] A perfect case in point--and the thing that got me right back to the business of criticizing--is the recent opinion-piece, Giving an F to New York's Restaurant Grading System, by Josh Ozersky published online at Time.com.[2] In the piece, Ozersky decries the posting of letter grades, based on a restaurant's most recent health inspection, as being akin to Hester Prynne "being...shamed for all the world to see. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:48 am
Kelley, ABA 2003b) In the Court of Public Opinion: Winning Strategies for Litigation Communications, 2nd ed., by James F. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:32 am
In other words, if you’re not using these forms, you should be. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:30 am
” In re Apple, Inc., 602 F.3d 909, 913 (8th Cir. 2010). [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:46 am
Die Post hatte u.a. angeführt: "Die rechtskräftige Feststellung, dass die Beschwerdegegnerinnen (offenbar planmässig) fragliche Geschäftspraktiken pflegten in Verbindung mit dem drohenden Imageschaden mache der Post die Fortführung der Geschäftsbeziehung unzumutbar und stelle einen wichtigen Grund für die Vertragsauflösung dar" Das BGer verneint dagegen das Vorliegen eines wichtigen Grundes. [read post]
