Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 7921 - 7940
of 40,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
In Day the respondent tenant served notices to the appellant landlord under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s 8 to acquire the freeholds of three properties which are large houses adapted to provide self-catering rooms on a short-term basis. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
After all, Covid-19 was the first global pandemic since 1919, and the conflict in Ukraine marks the first large-scale conventional conflict in Europe since World War II. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
See Hay v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
The Supreme Court decided this week the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am
With a large enough workforce, there will be statistical “proof” that at least one employee intended to favor or punish some party/candidate/viewpoint. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:59 pm
An AIPPI Rapid Response Event I WIPO's statistics for 2016: Asia continues to roar I UK UPC ratification still on track despite Article 50 trigger I Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 5:22 am
Garewal v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:15 pm
Hawaii v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 8:48 am
The court in Cincinnati v. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Even abortion has become largely a question of administrative law. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 7:47 pm
By Eric Goldman Moreno v. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 5:53 am
"From the gendered prose stylings of Seth Stevenson at Slate — "Ticktock of a Journalist’s Nightmare/The first day of the Palin v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:05 pm
The Grand Chamber builds on its earlier case law, integrating the developments which have occurred since the judgment in Guja v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:45 pm
Oddone v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:51 am
Unified Messaging Solutions v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:33 am
Purdy * Bosley Medical Institute v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 9:16 am
See Campbell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:17 pm
He suggested that the position “may well be fact sensitive”, pointing to the differences between the position in law of the ISPs in Godfrey v Demon Internet ([2001] EWHC QB 201), Bunt v Tilley (2006 EWHC 407 (QB)), and of Google Inc in Metropolitan International Schools Limited v Design Technica Corp. (2009 EWHC 1765 (QB)). [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:18 am
The court also cites StubHub v. [read post]
