Search for: "MRS v. State" Results 7921 - 7940 of 21,763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm by Giles Peaker
On A1 P1, though, Mr S ran into the problem that his tenancy agreement stated "100. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am by Dave
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am by Dave
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
  On the same day, no less, the IPKat learns of the consultation on the 15th draft of the Rules of Procedure of the UPC, and of Mr Justice Arnold’s exciting decision in Eli Lilly & Company v Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy (let’s call them Lilly and JAI). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:36 am
As the pre-game setting up of the pieces concluded, last minute procedural steps were being taken in the case of The United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:13 pm by Leanne Buckley-Thomson
Indeed towards the outset of his judgment he remarked upon the “unsatisfactory state of affairs given the importance of the concept in question“. [read post]