Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 7921 - 7940
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2015, 7:13 am
By: Daniel T. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:42 am
A suggestive mark, like a descriptive mark, should be protected only upon a showing that the mark has developed source significance in the minds of consumers.Very interesting and largely persuasive, though I think he misreads my Gone in 60 Milliseconds--he argues that quick mistakes are very hard to correct, but my points was that (accurate) recognition delays, allegedly produced by the presence of diluting marks, haven't been shown to affect real… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 38 [week ending Sunday 22 March] - Escalating prices of generic drugs in the US | EU Patent Package is not that dangerous | Hollywood screening rhythm | GC on 'Greenworld' trade mark in T - 106&14 | Spanish life after Google Tax | Africa and IP | GC on 'Smart Water' in Case T-250/13 | 'EPO does not violate fundamental rights', says EPO | Coca-Cola look-alike trade mark… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
Thus some extraneous matter, beyond the mark as registered, could be taken into account. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 am
Bearing this in mind, Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
They are afraid that if China gets too tough on North Korea it will only exacerbate matters—Pyongyang will pull away, Beijing will lose what little influence it has, and/or Pyongyang will escalate its provocations. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 11:07 am
(Frame of reference: In Mark Ronson’s ubiquitous song “Uptown Funk”, the time it takes Bruno Mars to sing “Stop, wait a minute, fill my cup, put some liquor in it” is exactly three seconds.) [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:31 pm
Be that as it may, here’s what I, for my part, couldn’t have told you before I read John’s post of March 19, 2015, entitled, “Some Thoughts on de facto and de jure Functionality,” which begins as follows: Section 2(e)(5) of the Lanham Act bars registration of a proposed mark that “comprises any matter that, as a whole, is functional. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:05 pm
In that case, AT&T lost a jury trial and then filed, under seal, motions for a renewed Judgment as a Matter of Law or a new trial. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:20 am
” Through Grindr, Mark LeMunyon, a Grindr subscriber, connected with an underage Grindr member seeking sex. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:59 am
(Wouldn’t the mark be subject to cancellation on this ground if the falsity were material?) [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:35 am
There will be times that our efforts, no matter how extreme, won’t be enough to make someone move, something happen. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:59 pm
The Court emphasized that: “When registration is opposed, there is good reason to think that both sides will take this matter seriously. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:28 am
I’d promised I’d wait on this, but I couldn’t, and you’ll see why. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
Merpel also wants to know: does it matter what your domain name is any more, now that most of us don't use them to find the site we're looking for? [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 2:41 am
Whatever you think I did,I didn't do it. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 11:04 am
But somehow you didn’t blow enough air into the machine. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
Your Service’s mark famous and distinguished. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:48 am
” The Board applies the following two-part test to determine whether a mark is disparaging: 1) what is the likely meaning of the matter in question, taking into account not only dictionary definitions, but also the relationship of the matter to the other elements in the mark, the nature of the goods or services, and the manner in which the mark is used in the marketplace in connection with the goods or services; and 2) if that meaning is found to… [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 8:25 pm
Mark Monitor isn't as complete.Is like a one-stop-shop for our group to organize requests and be able to see who is doing what. [read post]
